4.2.0: Build for ARM

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

4.2.0: Build for ARM

FR web forum
Hello dev team,

Here: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127040
Eric Bachard provide a patch to build AOO on Linux ARM (32 bits).

Maybe a good point for next 4.2.0?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

Marcus (OOo)
Am 24.11.2017 um 23:16 schrieb FR web forum:
> Here: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127040
> Eric Bachard provide a patch to build AOO on Linux ARM (32 bits).
>
> Maybe a good point for next 4.2.0?

I don't know how relevant the ARM architecture still is and if an office
suite is useful for it. However, someone needs to take care of the
ability for building on this platform. A patch is nice but is not enough
for future changes within the whole code base.

My 2 ct

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

Peter Kovacs-3
Maybe the patch is interesting to AndroOffice? Anyone from them on our list?

In general I'd say that we need a different gui for touch screen devices.

The other case is I can think of ARM processors is arduino machines with Linux installed. Don't know if this is a use case at all.

Am 27. November 2017 23:46:27 MEZ schrieb Marcus <[hidden email]>:

>Am 24.11.2017 um 23:16 schrieb FR web forum:
>> Here: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127040
>> Eric Bachard provide a patch to build AOO on Linux ARM (32 bits).
>>
>> Maybe a good point for next 4.2.0?
>
>I don't know how relevant the ARM architecture still is and if an
>office
>suite is useful for it. However, someone needs to take care of the
>ability for building on this platform. A patch is nice but is not
>enough
>for future changes within the whole code base.
>
>My 2 ct
>
>Marcus
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

Damjan Jovanovic
Raspberry Pis?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Peter kovacs <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Maybe the patch is interesting to AndroOffice? Anyone from them on our
> list?
>
> In general I'd say that we need a different gui for touch screen devices.
>
> The other case is I can think of ARM processors is arduino machines with
> Linux installed. Don't know if this is a use case at all.
>
> Am 27. November 2017 23:46:27 MEZ schrieb Marcus <[hidden email]>:
> >Am 24.11.2017 um 23:16 schrieb FR web forum:
> >> Here: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127040
> >> Eric Bachard provide a patch to build AOO on Linux ARM (32 bits).
> >>
> >> Maybe a good point for next 4.2.0?
> >
> >I don't know how relevant the ARM architecture still is and if an
> >office
> >suite is useful for it. However, someone needs to take care of the
> >ability for building on this platform. A patch is nice but is not
> >enough
> >for future changes within the whole code base.
> >
> >My 2 ct
> >
> >Marcus
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

Peter Kovacs-3
What's the category for those?

Am 28. November 2017 08:42:17 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic <[hidden email]>:

>Raspberry Pis?
>
>On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Peter kovacs <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Maybe the patch is interesting to AndroOffice? Anyone from them on
>our
>> list?
>>
>> In general I'd say that we need a different gui for touch screen
>devices.
>>
>> The other case is I can think of ARM processors is arduino machines
>with
>> Linux installed. Don't know if this is a use case at all.
>>
>> Am 27. November 2017 23:46:27 MEZ schrieb Marcus
><[hidden email]>:
>> >Am 24.11.2017 um 23:16 schrieb FR web forum:
>> >> Here: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127040
>> >> Eric Bachard provide a patch to build AOO on Linux ARM (32 bits).
>> >>
>> >> Maybe a good point for next 4.2.0?
>> >
>> >I don't know how relevant the ARM architecture still is and if an
>> >office
>> >suite is useful for it. However, someone needs to take care of the
>> >ability for building on this platform. A patch is nice but is not
>> >enough
>> >for future changes within the whole code base.
>> >
>> >My 2 ct
>> >
>> >Marcus
>> >
>> >
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

Damjan Jovanovic
What do you mean by category?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Peter kovacs <[hidden email]> wrote:

> What's the category for those?
>
> Am 28. November 2017 08:42:17 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic <
> [hidden email]>:
> >Raspberry Pis?
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Peter kovacs <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe the patch is interesting to AndroOffice? Anyone from them on
> >our
> >> list?
> >>
> >> In general I'd say that we need a different gui for touch screen
> >devices.
> >>
> >> The other case is I can think of ARM processors is arduino machines
> >with
> >> Linux installed. Don't know if this is a use case at all.
> >>
> >> Am 27. November 2017 23:46:27 MEZ schrieb Marcus
> ><[hidden email]>:
> >> >Am 24.11.2017 um 23:16 schrieb FR web forum:
> >> >> Here: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127040
> >> >> Eric Bachard provide a patch to build AOO on Linux ARM (32 bits).
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe a good point for next 4.2.0?
> >> >
> >> >I don't know how relevant the ARM architecture still is and if an
> >> >office
> >> >suite is useful for it. However, someone needs to take care of the
> >> >ability for building on this platform. A patch is nice but is not
> >> >enough
> >> >for future changes within the whole code base.
> >> >
> >> >My 2 ct
> >> >
> >> >Marcus
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> >For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

Peter Kovacs-3
How can anduino and rasperry machines referred to?

Am 28. November 2017 10:55:21 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic <[hidden email]>:

>What do you mean by category?
>
>On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Peter kovacs <[hidden email]>
>wrote:
>
>> What's the category for those?
>>
>> Am 28. November 2017 08:42:17 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic <
>> [hidden email]>:
>> >Raspberry Pis?
>> >
>> >On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Peter kovacs <[hidden email]>
>wrote:
>> >
>> >> Maybe the patch is interesting to AndroOffice? Anyone from them on
>> >our
>> >> list?
>> >>
>> >> In general I'd say that we need a different gui for touch screen
>> >devices.
>> >>
>> >> The other case is I can think of ARM processors is arduino
>machines
>> >with
>> >> Linux installed. Don't know if this is a use case at all.
>> >>
>> >> Am 27. November 2017 23:46:27 MEZ schrieb Marcus
>> ><[hidden email]>:
>> >> >Am 24.11.2017 um 23:16 schrieb FR web forum:
>> >> >> Here: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127040
>> >> >> Eric Bachard provide a patch to build AOO on Linux ARM (32
>bits).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Maybe a good point for next 4.2.0?
>> >> >
>> >> >I don't know how relevant the ARM architecture still is and if an
>> >> >office
>> >> >suite is useful for it. However, someone needs to take care of
>the
>> >> >ability for building on this platform. A patch is nice but is not
>> >> >enough
>> >> >for future changes within the whole code base.
>> >> >
>> >> >My 2 ct
>> >> >
>> >> >Marcus
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> >> >For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> >>
>> >>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

Damjan Jovanovic
Not sure about the Arduino, but the Raspberry Pi is usable as a desktop
computer, with a keyboard/mouse/screen.


On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Peter kovacs <[hidden email]> wrote:

> How can anduino and rasperry machines referred to?
>
> Am 28. November 2017 10:55:21 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic <
> [hidden email]>:
> >What do you mean by category?
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Peter kovacs <[hidden email]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> What's the category for those?
> >>
> >> Am 28. November 2017 08:42:17 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic <
> >> [hidden email]>:
> >> >Raspberry Pis?
> >> >
> >> >On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Peter kovacs <[hidden email]>
> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Maybe the patch is interesting to AndroOffice? Anyone from them on
> >> >our
> >> >> list?
> >> >>
> >> >> In general I'd say that we need a different gui for touch screen
> >> >devices.
> >> >>
> >> >> The other case is I can think of ARM processors is arduino
> >machines
> >> >with
> >> >> Linux installed. Don't know if this is a use case at all.
> >> >>
> >> >> Am 27. November 2017 23:46:27 MEZ schrieb Marcus
> >> ><[hidden email]>:
> >> >> >Am 24.11.2017 um 23:16 schrieb FR web forum:
> >> >> >> Here: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127040
> >> >> >> Eric Bachard provide a patch to build AOO on Linux ARM (32
> >bits).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Maybe a good point for next 4.2.0?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I don't know how relevant the ARM architecture still is and if an
> >> >> >office
> >> >> >suite is useful for it. However, someone needs to take care of
> >the
> >> >> >ability for building on this platform. A patch is nice but is not
> >> >> >enough
> >> >> >for future changes within the whole code base.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >My 2 ct
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Marcus
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> >> >For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>