Do we have a functional 64 bit version for Windows

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Do we have a functional 64 bit version for Windows

Keith N. McKenna
In reviewing Issue 125006
(https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125006) I find that one of
the possible causes was suggested to be that these large spreadsheets
may be running close to the memory limits allowable for 32 bit
applications. I would like to test the possibility of that by using a 64
bit version of Calc.

Regards
Keith


signature.asc (499 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Do we have a functional 64 bit version for Windows

Damjan Jovanovic
No. I began working on it, but it's not even remotely finished.

If you wish to help, build on a Win64 setup with --enable-win64 passed to
./configure. The build will break eventually, and the module it breaks in
is the next module you have to port ;).

Damjan

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 7:58 PM Keith N. McKenna <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> In reviewing Issue 125006
> (https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125006) I find that one of
> the possible causes was suggested to be that these large spreadsheets
> may be running close to the memory limits allowable for 32 bit
> applications. I would like to test the possibility of that by using a 64
> bit version of Calc.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Do we have a functional 64 bit version for Windows

Keith N. McKenna
In reply to this post by Keith N. McKenna
Sadly I am not a programmer and would not know where to begin even if I
had a Build environment set up which I do not. I need some new hardware
to set that up and as I am on a fixed income and have had medical
expenses lately has been put on hold. I will Bookmark the additional
configure switch so when I am able to get to it I can at least build it
and pass on the next module to port to dev@

Regards
Keith

On 9/21/2018 2:43 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:

> No. I began working on it, but it's not even remotely finished.
>
> If you wish to help, build on a Win64 setup with --enable-win64 passed to
> ./configure. The build will break eventually, and the module it breaks in
> is the next module you have to port ;).
>
> Damjan
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 7:58 PM Keith N. McKenna <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> In reviewing Issue 125006
>> (https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125006) I find that one of
>> the possible causes was suggested to be that these large spreadsheets
>> may be running close to the memory limits allowable for 32 bit
>> applications. I would like to test the possibility of that by using a 64
>> bit version of Calc.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
>>
>>
>


signature.asc (499 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Do we have a functional 64 bit version for Windows

Peter Kovacs-3
In reply to this post by Damjan Jovanovic
Maybe this Error Report is the next?

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774

On 9/21/18 8:43 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:

> No. I began working on it, but it's not even remotely finished.
>
> If you wish to help, build on a Win64 setup with --enable-win64 passed to
> ./configure. The build will break eventually, and the module it breaks in
> is the next module you have to port ;).
>
> Damjan
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 7:58 PM Keith N. McKenna <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> In reviewing Issue 125006
>> (https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125006) I find that one of
>> the possible causes was suggested to be that these large spreadsheets
>> may be running close to the memory limits allowable for 32 bit
>> applications. I would like to test the possibility of that by using a 64
>> bit version of Calc.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]