Fixes for bootstrap?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fixes for bootstrap?

Pedro Lino-3
Hi all

I have managed to compile successfully branch 4.2.X under Ubuntu 18.04 x64 but there are some errors during download of external dependencies that maybe someone can fix?

First situaton:

download from http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz failed (404 Not Found)
download failed

This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build system and could be corrected?

Second situation:

Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has mirror issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server?

E.g.
download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
download failed
download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
etc

Third situation:

Downloaded modules checksums are not verified

downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e
downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz
downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part
checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4

Can this be added? All other modules are verified

Fourth situation:

downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part
MD5 checksum is OK

The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz

Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d is from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020

Thanks!
Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

Matthias Seidel
Hi Pedro,

Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:

> Hi all
>
> I have managed to compile successfully branch 4.2.X under Ubuntu 18.04 x64 but there are some errors during download of external dependencies that maybe someone can fix?
>
> First situaton:
>
> download from http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz failed (404 Not Found)
> download failed
>
> This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build system and could be corrected?
Fixed now, see:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Second situation:
>
> Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has mirror issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server?
>
> E.g.
> download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
> download failed
> download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
> etc
>
> Third situation:
>
> Downloaded modules checksums are not verified
>
> downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
> checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e
> downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz
> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part
> checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4
>
> Can this be added? All other modules are verified
>
> Fourth situation:
>
> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part
> MD5 checksum is OK
>
> The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz
>
> Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d is from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020
>
> Thanks!
> Pedro
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

Pedro Lino-3
Hi Matthias

> On 07/04/2020 10:55 PM Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:

> > download from http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz failed (404 Not Found)
> > download failed
> >
> > This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build system and could be corrected?
>
> Fixed now, see:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0

Excellent! This raises three additional questions:

1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version
https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/
(Same as situation 4 below)

Could I just go into github and fix occurrences of jpeg-8d to jpeg-9d (also fixing the md5)?
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/search?q=jpeg-8d&unscoped_q=jpeg-8d

2) Can I approve your commit?
3) How can this be cherry picked to branch 4.2.x ?

What about situations 2 and 3?

Regards,
Pedro

> > Second situation:
> >
> > Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has mirror issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server?
> >
> > E.g.
> > download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
> > download failed
> > download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
> > etc
> >
> > Third situation:
> >
> > Downloaded modules checksums are not verified
> >
> > downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
> > downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
> > checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e
> > downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz
> > downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part
> > checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4
> >
> > Can this be added? All other modules are verified
> >
> > Fourth situation:
> >
> > downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part
> > MD5 checksum is OK
> >
> > The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz
> >
> > Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d is from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Pedro
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

Matthias Seidel
Hi Pedro,

Am 05.07.20 um 01:35 schrieb Pedro Lino:

> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 07/04/2020 10:55 PM Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>> download from http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz failed (404 Not Found)
>>> download failed
>>>
>>> This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build system and could be corrected?
>> Fixed now, see:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0
> Excellent! This raises three additional questions:
>
> 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/
> (Same as situation 4 below)
Remember, I am not a developer! ;-)

But it is not done with simply downloading a newer version, most likely
the build must be adapted and patches changed...

> Could I just go into github and fix occurrences of jpeg-8d to jpeg-9d (also fixing the md5)?
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/search?q=jpeg-8d&unscoped_q=jpeg-8d
See above.
>
> 2) Can I approve your commit?
I don't understand this one. My commit is in, I have write access on Git.
> 3) How can this be cherry picked to branch 4.2.x ?

I have already cherry-picked it for AOO42X.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> What about situations 2 and 3?
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>>> Second situation:
>>>
>>> Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has mirror issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server?
>>>
>>> E.g.
>>> download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
>>> download failed
>>> download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
>>> etc
>>>
>>> Third situation:
>>>
>>> Downloaded modules checksums are not verified
>>>
>>> downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
>>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
>>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e
>>> downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz
>>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part
>>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4
>>>
>>> Can this be added? All other modules are verified
>>>
>>> Fourth situation:
>>>
>>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part
>>> MD5 checksum is OK
>>>
>>> The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d is from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Pedro
>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

Pedro Lino-3
Hi Matthias

> On 07/05/2020 9:41 AM Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Am 05.07.20 um 01:35 schrieb Pedro Lino:

> > 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/
> > (Same as situation 4 below)
>
> Remember, I am not a developer! ;-)
>
> But it is not done with simply downloading a newer version, most likely
> the build must be adapted and patches changed...

I do remember. Neither am I ;)
Maybe someone on this mailing list who is a developer can have a look into this and the jpeg v9d?

And maybe he/she can also provide some feedback on Situations 2 and 3 below?
 
> > 2) Can I approve your commit?
> I don't understand this one. My commit is in, I have write access on Git.

I saw some changes were approved by other people. Since this is a simple url switch I could approve it

> > 3) How can this be cherry picked to branch 4.2.x ?
>
> I have already cherry-picked it for AOO42X.

Excellent. I will do a git pull origin AOO42X ;)

Regards,
Pedro

> > What about situations 2 and 3?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >>> Second situation:
> >>>
> >>> Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has mirror issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server?
> >>>
> >>> E.g.
> >>> download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
> >>> download failed
> >>> download from https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2 failed (302 Found)
> >>> etc
> >>>
> >>> Third situation:
> >>>
> >>> Downloaded modules checksums are not verified
> >>>
> >>> downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
> >>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
> >>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e
> >>> downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz
> >>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part
> >>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4
> >>>
> >>> Can this be added? All other modules are verified
> >>>
> >>> Fourth situation:
> >>>
> >>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part
> >>> MD5 checksum is OK
> >>>
> >>> The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz
> >>>
> >>> Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d is from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Pedro
> >>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

Don Lewis-2
In reply to this post by Pedro Lino-3
On  5 Jul, Pedro Lino wrote:

> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 07/04/2020 10:55 PM Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>
>> > download from http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz failed (404 Not Found)
>> > download failed
>> >
>> > This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build system and could be corrected?
>>
>> Fixed now, see:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0
>
> Excellent! This raises three additional questions:
>
> 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/
> (Same as situation 4 below)

As I recall, recent versions of vigra require a C++11 compiler, which
isn't available on some of our older platforms.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fixes for bootstrap?

Pedro Lino-3
Hi Don, all

> On 07/05/2020 10:08 AM Don Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>  
> On  5 Jul, Pedro Lino wrote:

> > 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/
> > (Same as situation 4 below)
>
> As I recall, recent versions of vigra require a C++11 compiler, which
> isn't available on some of our older platforms.

Thank you for the fast answer!

Best regards,
Pedro

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]