Fwd: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
18 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Andrea Pescetti-2
(I'm forwarding this call for tests to the QA list and the l10n list)

It is very important to test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2 thoroughly: please
download it from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
and use it for your normal tasks but also to mark as "VERIFIED" the bugs
listed at
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=170764&namedcmd=4.1.2_approved_and_fixed&remaction=run&sharer_id=7

Bugs marked as RESOLVED FIXED must be set to VERIFIED or REOPENED. Note
that many are still in RESOLVED FIXED state but have indeed been
verified if you read the issue. In that case it is enough to change the
issue status, but an extra verification is always helpful.

Remember, building a new Release Candidate takes time and effort, so:
- It is time to be more careful with release blockers: you can still
propose a Release Blocker, but please accept that it will likely be
denied unless we are sure that it is low-risk and important.
- I do not exclude that an RC3 will come, but we want RC2 to be fully
tested before building it, and we must definitely avoid an RC4.

These bugs are now open for a possible RC3:
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126586 from Damjan; nedds
more information, asked.
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=107619 Bug in Find & replace
with regular expression: already accepted blocker, solution was
incomplete in RC2, now supposedly fixed
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126582 When trying to access
a read/only share on Sharepoint an error is shown: This is new but it
addresses the same use case of the other Sharepoint fixes
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126573 Dictionaries were
actually not updated in some cases, probably due to a not completely
clean build, to be investigated
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126588 Portuguese dictionary
to be updated: I'll now ask the l10n list to suggest other possible
dictionary updates.

So: not many bugs so far, and not so bad. But we will have the full
picture only if everybody helps in testing, it's very easy to do so.

Regards,
   Andrea.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Pedro Lino
Hi all

Bugs marked as RESOLVED FIXED must be set to VERIFIED or REOPENED. Note
> that many are still in RESOLVED FIXED state but have indeed been
> verified if you read the issue. In that case it is enough to change the
> issue status, but an extra verification is always helpful.
>
>
I have Verified several Fixed bugs but only in Comments since I don't
have permission to change Status.

Do I need a special permission from someone or this is a bug in bugzilla?

Regards,
Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

marcus
Am 10/15/2015 10:50 AM, schrieb Pedro Lino:

> Bugs marked as RESOLVED FIXED must be set to VERIFIED or REOPENED. Note
>> that many are still in RESOLVED FIXED state but have indeed been
>> verified if you read the issue. In that case it is enough to change the
>> issue status, but an extra verification is always helpful.
>>
>>
> I have Verified several Fixed bugs but only in Comments since I don't
> have permission to change Status.
>
> Do I need a special permission from someone or this is a bug in bugzilla?

I've added you to the "canconfirm" and "qa-team" groups. I think you
should be able to change the issue status now. If not, just tell me.

Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Hemu Hemendra
hello Qa team,

                        how to download latest version , i found some bugs
in previous versions. can it be resolved in upcoming versions.

Regards,
hemendra

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Marcus <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Am 10/15/2015 10:50 AM, schrieb Pedro Lino:
>
>> Bugs marked as RESOLVED FIXED must be set to VERIFIED or REOPENED. Note
>>
>>> that many are still in RESOLVED FIXED state but have indeed been
>>> verified if you read the issue. In that case it is enough to change the
>>> issue status, but an extra verification is always helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have Verified several Fixed bugs but only in Comments since I don't
>> have permission to change Status.
>>
>> Do I need a special permission from someone or this is a bug in bugzilla?
>>
>
> I've added you to the "canconfirm" and "qa-team" groups. I think you
> should be able to change the issue status now. If not, just tell me.
>
> Marcus
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Phani Sri
In reply to this post by Andrea Pescetti-2
Hello QA Team,

 how to download Apachi OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2.

 I have downloaded from the following link but I was unable to install it.

Can anyone help me.?

I appreciate your time.

Thanks
Sri



On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Andrea Pescetti <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> (I'm forwarding this call for tests to the QA list and the l10n list)
>
> It is very important to test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2 thoroughly: please
> download it from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> and use it for your normal tasks but also to mark as "VERIFIED" the bugs
> listed at
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=170764&namedcmd=4.1.2_approved_and_fixed&remaction=run&sharer_id=7
>
> Bugs marked as RESOLVED FIXED must be set to VERIFIED or REOPENED. Note
> that many are still in RESOLVED FIXED state but have indeed been
> verified if you read the issue. In that case it is enough to change the
> issue status, but an extra verification is always helpful.
>
> Remember, building a new Release Candidate takes time and effort, so:
> - It is time to be more careful with release blockers: you can still
> propose a Release Blocker, but please accept that it will likely be
> denied unless we are sure that it is low-risk and important.
> - I do not exclude that an RC3 will come, but we want RC2 to be fully
> tested before building it, and we must definitely avoid an RC4.
>
> These bugs are now open for a possible RC3:
> - https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126586 from Damjan; nedds
> more information, asked.
> - https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=107619 Bug in Find & replace
> with regular expression: already accepted blocker, solution was
> incomplete in RC2, now supposedly fixed
> - https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126582 When trying to access
> a read/only share on Sharepoint an error is shown: This is new but it
> addresses the same use case of the other Sharepoint fixes
> - https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126573 Dictionaries were
> actually not updated in some cases, probably due to a not completely
> clean build, to be investigated
> - https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126588 Portuguese dictionary
> to be updated: I'll now ask the l10n list to suggest other possible
> dictionary updates.
>
> So: not many bugs so far, and not so bad. But we will have the full
> picture only if everybody helps in testing, it's very easy to do so.
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Dennis E. Hamilton


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phani Sri [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 12:37
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2
>
> Hello QA Team,
>
>  how to download Apachi OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2.
>
>  I have downloaded from the following link but I was unable to install
> it.
>
> Can anyone help me.?
>
> I appreciate your time.
>
> Thanks
> Sri

[orcmid]
   Which of the files did you download?  Give the full name.

   (E.g., something like
    Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe)

[ ... ]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

FW: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Dennis E. Hamilton
In case not subscribed [BCC to Phani Sri]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 15:34
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: RE: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phani Sri [mailto:[hidden email]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 12:37
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Subject: Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2
> >
> > Hello QA Team,
> >
> >  how to download Apachi OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2.
> >
> >  I have downloaded from the following link but I was unable to install
> > it.
> >
> > Can anyone help me.?
> >
> > I appreciate your time.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sri
>
> [orcmid]
>    Which of the files did you download?  Give the full name.
>
>    (E.g., something like
>     Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe)
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Phani Sri
In reply to this post by Dennis E. Hamilton
Hello Dennis,

Thank you so much for your response.

I have downloaded the following link.

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/

There I have got couple of files. Those are

dist - Revision 10829: /dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source

   - ..
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.asc
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.asc>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.md5
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.md5>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.sha256
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.sha256>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.asc
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.asc>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.md5
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.md5>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.sha256
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.sha256>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.asc
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.asc>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.md5
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.md5>
   - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.sha
   <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.sha256>

When I click the first one it gave me some files. But I don't get any idea
how to install the OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2 as I do not see any run option . I
can open the Bugzilla through the following link, but I do need to install
OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2 in my machine right to find the bugs and to check them.

I really like to participate with you all to test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2.
Please let me know If I am doing wrong process to install OpenOffice
4.1.2-RC2.



I appreciate your time.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[hidden email]
> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phani Sri [mailto:[hidden email]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 12:37
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Subject: Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2
> >
> > Hello QA Team,
> >
> >  how to download Apachi OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2.
> >
> >  I have downloaded from the following link but I was unable to install
> > it.
> >
> > Can anyone help me.?
> >
> > I appreciate your time.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sri
>
> [orcmid]
>    Which of the files did you download?  Give the full name.
>
>    (E.g., something like
>     Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe)
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Kay Schenk-2
Hello Phani --

I think you probably want to test one of the pre-built binaries
rather than source. Please see available languages and platforms from:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/binaries/

Once you click inside a language directory, you will see platform
options along with verification files -- MD5, etc. Linux downloads
are in compressed format, Mac and Win have direct install files.



On 10/17/2015 09:29 AM, Phani Sri wrote:

> Hello Dennis,
>
> Thank you so much for your response.
>
> I have downloaded the following link.
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
>
> There I have got couple of files. Those are
>
> dist - Revision 10829: /dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source
>
>    - ..
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.asc
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.asc>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.md5
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.md5>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.sha256
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.bz2.sha256>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.asc
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.asc>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.md5
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.md5>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.sha256
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.tar.gz.sha256>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.asc
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.asc>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.md5
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.md5>
>    - apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.sha
>    <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/source/apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1707648-src.zip.sha256>
>
> When I click the first one it gave me some files. But I don't get any idea
> how to install the OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2 as I do not see any run option . I
> can open the Bugzilla through the following link, but I do need to install
> OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2 in my machine right to find the bugs and to check them.
>
> I really like to participate with you all to test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2.
> Please let me know If I am doing wrong process to install OpenOffice
> 4.1.2-RC2.
>
>
>
> I appreciate your time.
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[hidden email]
>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Phani Sri [mailto:[hidden email]]
>>> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 12:37
>>> To: [hidden email]
>>> Subject: Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2
>>>
>>> Hello QA Team,
>>>
>>>  how to download Apachi OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2.
>>>
>>>  I have downloaded from the following link but I was unable to install
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Can anyone help me.?
>>>
>>> I appreciate your time.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sri
>>
>> [orcmid]
>>    Which of the files did you download?  Give the full name.
>>
>>    (E.g., something like
>>     Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe)
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>

--
--------------------------------------------
MzK

“The journey of a thousand miles begins
 with a single step.”
                          --Lao Tzu



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Andrea Pescetti-2
In reply to this post by Phani Sri
Phani Sri wrote:
> I have downloaded the following link.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> There I have got couple of files.

The English version for Windows is here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

If you need another version, look withing the "binaries" folder.

Do you want some issues to verify? Just open

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&f1=flagtypes.name&list_id=170870&o1=substring&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&resolution=FIXED&v1=4.1.2_release_blocker%2B

and comment on the issues that are RESOLVED FIXED.

For example, 126480 is very easy: Just check that the version number in
the window you reach through the "About" menu says correctly 4.1.2.

And 126567 asks you to check that in the same window you read Copyright
2015 and not 2014.

For every successful check, please write that you verified it with
version 4.1.2-RC2, English, Windows (for example).

You need a Bugzilla account to post comments: register get one at
https://bz.apache.org/ooo if you don't have one already.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Andrea Pescetti-2
In reply to this post by Hemu Hemendra
Hemu Hemendra wrote:
> how to download latest version , i found some bugs
> in previous versions. can it be resolved in upcoming versions.

The latest version (to be used for tests) is available at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/binaries/ 
(English for Windows:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe 
).

Remaining tests to be done are listed at http://s.apache.org/KL1 and
most of them now contain a simple explanation of what is needed to test.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Pedro Lino
One question:

RC1 was

AOO412m1(Build:9780)  -  Rev. 1705625
2015-09-28 12:45:04 (Mo, 28 Sep 2015)

and RC2 is

AOO412m2(Build:9781)  -  Rev. 1707648
2015-09-28 12:45:04 (Mo, 28 Sep 2015)

The date/time is the same. Is this expected or is it a Bug?

Regards,
Pedro


On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Andrea Pescetti <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hemu Hemendra wrote:
>
>> how to download latest version , i found some bugs
>> in previous versions. can it be resolved in upcoming versions.
>>
>
> The latest version (to be used for tests) is available at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/binaries/
> (English for Windows:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
> ).
>
> Remaining tests to be done are listed at http://s.apache.org/KL1 and most
> of them now contain a simple explanation of what is needed to test.
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Andrea Pescetti-2
On 18/10/2015 Pedro Lino wrote:
> RC1 was
> AOO412m1(Build:9780)  -  Rev. 1705625
> 2015-09-28 12:45:04 (Mo, 28 Sep 2015)
>
> and RC2 is
> AOO412m2(Build:9781)  -  Rev. 1707648
> 2015-09-28 12:45:04 (Mo, 28 Sep 2015)
>
> The date/time is the same. Is this expected or is it a Bug?

It isn't expected. So it's a bug, thank you. Not a real bug in the code
since it depends on the build environment, but we may want to recheck it
for the RC3 build. In my system it is correct:

AOO412m2(Build:9781)  -  Rev. 1707648
2015-10-09 09:35 - Linux x86_64

Are you using the Windows build? Since this depends on the build
environment, it is system-specific.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Pedro Lino
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Andrea Pescetti <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> On 18/10/2015 Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> RC1 was
>> AOO412m1(Build:9780)  -  Rev. 1705625
>> 2015-09-28 12:45:04 (Mo, 28 Sep 2015)
>>
>> and RC2 is
>> AOO412m2(Build:9781)  -  Rev. 1707648
>> 2015-09-28 12:45:04 (Mo, 28 Sep 2015)
>>
>> The date/time is the same. Is this expected or is it a Bug?
>>
>
> It isn't expected. So it's a bug, thank you. Not a real bug in the code
> since it depends on the build environment, but we may want to recheck it
> for the RC3 build. In my system it is correct:
>
> AOO412m2(Build:9781)  -  Rev. 1707648
> 2015-10-09 09:35 - Linux x86_64
>
> Are you using the Windows build? Since this depends on the build
> environment, it is system-specific.


Yes, I am. In fact I believe that is another bug/missing feature. It
doesn't make sense that the second line in the AOO About box (apparently
only under Windows) is the date in two different formats but fails to
report what the platform is (which version of Windows and if the OS is 32
or 64 bits).

The fact that the About information misses this information forces people
(particularly in QA) to have to ask when it should be obvious (in fact it
is obvious in the information you pasted from Linux)

Regards,
Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Andrea Pescetti-2
Pedro Lino wrote:
> the second line in the AOO About box (apparently
> only under Windows) is the date in two different formats but fails to
> report what the platform is (which version of Windows and if the OS is 32
> or 64 bits).

This is still on the build side. I mean, mine says Linux 64-bit since it
was BUILT for Linux 64-bit. It doesn't extract information from the real
environment where you are running it. And since we only distribute one
Windows version, the most we could get there is the generic "Windows"
string.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Pedro Lino
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrea Pescetti <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> the second line in the AOO About box (apparently
>> only under Windows) is the date in two different formats but fails to
>> report what the platform is (which version of Windows and if the OS is 32
>> or 64 bits).
>>
>
> This is still on the build side. I mean, mine says Linux 64-bit since it
> was BUILT for Linux 64-bit. It doesn't extract information from the real
> environment where you are running it. And since we only distribute one
> Windows version, the most we could get there is the generic "Windows"
> string.
>

Yes, you are correct. That should be enough. I realized later that I was
mixing concepts.

Regards,
Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea, all

One quick question: why do all the exe files in AOO 4.1.2 have version
number 4.0.9780.500? (they were 4.0.9774.500 in AOO 4.1.1)

Shouldn't it be at least 4.1.9870.500 (so that it matches the 4.1 branch)?
Or better yet 4.1.2.9870.500 (so that users could ignore the exact build
but still know which version the file belongs to)?

Regards,
Pedro

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Pedro Lino <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrea Pescetti <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Pedro Lino wrote:
>>
>>> the second line in the AOO About box (apparently
>>> only under Windows) is the date in two different formats but fails to
>>> report what the platform is (which version of Windows and if the OS is 32
>>> or 64 bits).
>>>
>>
>> This is still on the build side. I mean, mine says Linux 64-bit since it
>> was BUILT for Linux 64-bit. It doesn't extract information from the real
>> environment where you are running it. And since we only distribute one
>> Windows version, the most we could get there is the generic "Windows"
>> string.
>>
>
> Yes, you are correct. That should be enough. I realized later that I was
> mixing concepts.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

Andrea Pescetti-2
Pedro Lino wrote:
> One quick question: why do all the exe files in AOO 4.1.2 have version
> number 4.0.9780.500? (they were 4.0.9774.500 in AOO 4.1.1)
> Shouldn't it be at least 4.1.9870.500 (so that it matches the 4.1 branch)?
> Or better yet 4.1.2.9870.500 (so that users could ignore the exact build
> but still know which version the file belongs to)?

Yes, this is a nice find! This is clearly a cosmetic issue and if the
number is already broken in 4.1.1 we won't fix it in 4.1.2 (it would be
too late anyway; RC3 is being uploaded right now), but it would be nice
if you can open an issue for it and place a comment in
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126480 with a link to it, so
that we know that this number should be analyzed too when updating
version numbers.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]