Re: [porting-cvs] CVS update [cws_oof680_c03v8]: /porting/sal/osl/w32/

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [porting-cvs] CVS update [cws_oof680_c03v8]: /porting/sal/osl/w32/

stephan.bergmann
[hidden email] wrote:

> Tag: cws_oof680_c03v8
> User: hro    
> Date: 2007/04/27 02:47:34
>
> Modified:
>    porting/sal/osl/w32/process.c
>
> Log:
>  #i59251 Ignore osl_setCommandArgs to support UTF-16 file names
>
> File Changes:
>
> Directory: /porting/sal/osl/w32/
> ================================
>
> File [changed]: process.c
> Url: http://porting.openoffice.org/source/browse/porting/sal/osl/w32/process.c?r1=1.32&r2=1.32.138.1
> Delta lines:  +12 -10
> ---------------------
> --- process.c 20 Jun 2006 04:21:44 -0000 1.32
> +++ process.c 27 Apr 2007 09:47:32 -0000 1.32.138.1
> @@ -264,22 +264,22 @@
>   0
>  };
>  
> +#pragma warning( push )
> +#pragma warning( disable: 4100 )
>  static rtl_uString ** osl_createCommandArgs_Impl (int argc, char ** argv)

Moin Hennes,

Warum nicht statt #pragma warning einfach die Parameter von der
static-Funktion ganz weglassen?

-Stephan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: [porting-cvs] CVS update [cws_oof680_c03v8]: /porting/sal/osl/w32/

James Mckenzie
Stephan:

Englisch bitte!

(English please!)

James McKenzie


-----Original Message-----

>From: Stephan Bergmann <[hidden email]>
>Sent: Apr 27, 2007 3:57 AM
>To: [hidden email]
>Subject: [porting-dev] Re: [porting-cvs] CVS update [cws_oof680_c03v8]: /porting/sal/osl/w32/
>
>[hidden email] wrote:
>> Tag: cws_oof680_c03v8
>> User: hro    
>> Date: 2007/04/27 02:47:34
>>
>> Modified:
>>    porting/sal/osl/w32/process.c
>>
>> Log:
>>  #i59251 Ignore osl_setCommandArgs to support UTF-16 file names
>>
>> File Changes:
>>
>> Directory: /porting/sal/osl/w32/
>> ================================
>>
>> File [changed]: process.c
>> Url: http://porting.openoffice.org/source/browse/porting/sal/osl/w32/process.c?r1=1.32&r2=1.32.138.1
>> Delta lines:  +12 -10
>> ---------------------
>> --- process.c 20 Jun 2006 04:21:44 -0000 1.32
>> +++ process.c 27 Apr 2007 09:47:32 -0000 1.32.138.1
>> @@ -264,22 +264,22 @@
>>   0
>>  };
>>  
>> +#pragma warning( push )
>> +#pragma warning( disable: 4100 )
>>  static rtl_uString ** osl_createCommandArgs_Impl (int argc, char ** argv)
>
>Moin Hennes,
>
>Warum nicht statt #pragma warning einfach die Parameter von der
>static-Funktion ganz weglassen?
>
>-Stephan
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: [porting-cvs] CVS update [cws_oof680_c03v8]: /porting/sal/osl/w32/

stephan.bergmann
In reply to this post by stephan.bergmann
Wrong "To" field, sorry...

Stephan Bergmann wrote:

> [hidden email] wrote:
>> Tag: cws_oof680_c03v8
>> User: hro     Date: 2007/04/27 02:47:34
>>
>> Modified:
>>    porting/sal/osl/w32/process.c
>>
>> Log:
>>  #i59251 Ignore osl_setCommandArgs to support UTF-16 file names
>>
>> File Changes:
>>
>> Directory: /porting/sal/osl/w32/
>> ================================
>>
>> File [changed]: process.c
>> Url:
>> http://porting.openoffice.org/source/browse/porting/sal/osl/w32/process.c?r1=1.32&r2=1.32.138.1 
>>
>> Delta lines:  +12 -10
>> ---------------------
>> --- process.c    20 Jun 2006 04:21:44 -0000    1.32
>> +++ process.c    27 Apr 2007 09:47:32 -0000    1.32.138.1
>> @@ -264,22 +264,22 @@
>>      0
>>  };
>>  
>> +#pragma warning( push )
>> +#pragma warning( disable: 4100 )
>>  static rtl_uString ** osl_createCommandArgs_Impl (int argc, char **
>> argv)
>
> Moin Hennes,
>
> Warum nicht statt #pragma warning einfach die Parameter von der
> static-Funktion ganz weglassen?
>
> -Stephan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]