Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
23 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Jim Jagielski
After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.

So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?

I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.

So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
(after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
start on 4.1.4-RC5

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim,

If time permits, could you have a look at:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538

Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4.

Regards, Matthias

P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5


Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>
> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>
> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>
> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Andrea Pescetti-2
In reply to this post by Jim Jagielski
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
> start on 4.1.4-RC5

Wise choice. I totally agree. This clearly supersedes my earlier
proposal of a 4.1.4 followed by 4.1.5 next month.

I would be for a quick RC5, ignoring all other issues. Vote could even
start in less than 24 hours, if build/upload is fast.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Jim Jagielski
In reply to this post by Matthias Seidel
Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?

> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
>
> Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4.
>
> Regards, Matthias
>
> P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5
>
>
> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
>> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
>> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>>
>> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>>
>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>>
>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
>> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Matthias Seidel
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?

No.

>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
>>
>> Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4.
>>
>> Regards, Matthias
>>
>> P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5
>>
>>
>> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
>>> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
>>> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>>>
>>> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>>>
>>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
>>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>>>
>>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
>>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
>>> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Matthias Seidel
In reply to this post by Andrea Pescetti-2
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
>> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>
> Wise choice. I totally agree. This clearly supersedes my earlier
> proposal of a 4.1.4 followed by 4.1.5 next month.
>
> I would be for a quick RC5, ignoring all other issues. Vote could even
> start in less than 24 hours, if build/upload is fast.
Timing is good on my side, as I have a day of today... ;-)
But upload could take some time for Windows files.
(For the next release I plan to get a faster connection)

Regards, Matthias

>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>



smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Jim Jagielski
In reply to this post by Matthias Seidel
Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review
and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;)

Thx!

> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?
>
> No.
>
>>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>>>
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
>>>
>>> Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4.
>>>
>>> Regards, Matthias
>>>
>>> P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
>>>> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
>>>> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>>>>
>>>> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>>>>
>>>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
>>>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>>>>
>>>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>>>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
>>>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
>>>> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Pedro Lino-3
In reply to this post by Jim Jagielski

> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.

+1

> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
> start on 4.1.4-RC5

Thank you for reconsidering and for staying as RM!
Looking forward to test 4.1.4 RC5 under Windows 7 and 10 as soon as it is available.

Pedro

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Rory O'Farrell
In reply to this post by Jim Jagielski
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:20:53 -0400
Jim Jagielski <[hidden email]> wrote:

> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>
> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>
> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>
> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>

I think this is the best solution.

--
Rory O'Farrell <[hidden email]>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Jim Jagielski
I am starting on macOS and Linux-64 builds for 4.1.4-RC5 as we speak.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Matthias Seidel
In reply to this post by Jim Jagielski
Jim,

can you give a short hint when you start building RC5 and the revision#?

Matthias


Am 11.10.2017 um 14:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

> Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review
> and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;)
>
> Thx!
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?
>> No.
>>
>>>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>>>>
>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
>>>>
>>>> Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Matthias
>>>>
>>>> P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
>>>>> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
>>>>> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>>>>>
>>>>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
>>>>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>>>>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
>>>>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
>>>>> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Jim Jagielski
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 1811822
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: jim
Last Changed Rev: 1811817
Last Changed Date: 2017-10-11 08:11:42 -0400 (Wed, 11 Oct 2017)


> On Oct 11, 2017, at 9:10 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> can you give a short hint when you start building RC5 and the revision#?
>
> Matthias
>
>
> Am 11.10.2017 um 14:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review
>> and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;)
>>
>> Thx!
>>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?
>>> No.
>>>
>>>>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
>>>>>
>>>>> Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
>>>>>> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
>>>>>> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
>>>>>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>>>>>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
>>>>>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
>>>>>> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Kay Schenk-2
In reply to this post by Pedro Lino-3

On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
>> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
>> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>
> +1

my +1 also!

>
>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
>> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>
> Thank you for reconsidering and for staying as RM!
> Looking forward to test 4.1.4 RC5 under Windows 7 and 10 as soon as it is available.

yes! Thanks Jim.

>
> Pedro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

--
------------------------------------------
MzK

"Only the truth will save you now."
       -- Ensei Tankado, "Digital Fortress"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Starting builds of 4.1.4-RC5

Jim Jagielski
In reply to this post by Jim Jagielski
Official SVN rev will be:

    1811857.

% svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 1811857
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: jim
Last Changed Rev: 1811857
Last Changed Date: 2017-10-11 13:48:15 -0400 (Wed, 11 Oct 2017)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Starting builds of 4.1.4-RC5

Matthias Seidel
OK, then I will start again with 1811857.


Am 11.10.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

> Official SVN rev will be:
>
>     1811857.
>
> % svn info
> Path: .
> Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
> URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
> Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
> Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
> Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
> Revision: 1811857
> Node Kind: directory
> Schedule: normal
> Last Changed Author: jim
> Last Changed Rev: 1811857
> Last Changed Date: 2017-10-11 13:48:15 -0400 (Wed, 11 Oct 2017)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Peter Kovacs-3
In reply to this post by Kay Schenk-2
Jim, you are the Boss! :)
It is good you stay Release Manager! I appreciate that a lot!

Am 11. Oktober 2017 18:27:55 MESZ schrieb Kay Schenk <[hidden email]>:

>
>On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>
>>> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski <[hidden email]>
>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
>>> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
>>> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>>
>> +1
>
>my +1 also!
>
>>
>>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
>>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
>>> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>>
>> Thank you for reconsidering and for staying as RM!
>> Looking forward to test 4.1.4 RC5 under Windows 7 and 10 as soon as
>it is available.
>
>yes! Thanks Jim.
>
>>
>> Pedro
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Marcus (OOo)
In reply to this post by Jim Jagielski
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>
> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>
> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>
> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
> start on 4.1.4-RC5

\o/ great choice. :-)

Thanks a lot for this. You have my support.

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Starting builds of 4.1.4-RC5

Jim Jagielski
In reply to this post by Jim Jagielski
Uploads of AOO 4.1.4-RC5 for Linux 32 bit builds are being
committed as we speak...

> On Oct 11, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Jim Jagielski <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Official SVN rev will be:
>
>    1811857.
>
> % svn info
> Path: .
> Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
> URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
> Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
> Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
> Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
> Revision: 1811857
> Node Kind: directory
> Schedule: normal
> Last Changed Author: jim
> Last Changed Rev: 1811857
> Last Changed Date: 2017-10-11 13:48:15 -0400 (Wed, 11 Oct 2017)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Starting builds of 4.1.4-RC5

Matthias Seidel
In reply to this post by Jim Jagielski
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/binaries/de/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_de.tar.gz
shows me 1811817

while

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/binaries/de/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Linux_x86_install-deb_de.tar.gz
is at 1811857


Am 11.10.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

> Official SVN rev will be:
>
>     1811857.
>
> % svn info
> Path: .
> Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
> URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
> Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
> Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
> Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
> Revision: 1811857
> Node Kind: directory
> Schedule: normal
> Last Changed Author: jim
> Last Changed Rev: 1811857
> Last Changed Date: 2017-10-11 13:48:15 -0400 (Wed, 11 Oct 2017)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Starting builds of 4.1.4-RC5

Jim Jagielski
That is weird... svn info on that build machine shows the right number.

I am guessing that something wasn't correctly cleaned from the build and
the old rev number is tucked away someplace. I will start a brand new, from
scratch build for Linux 64.

Thx!

> On Oct 12, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Matthias Seidel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/binaries/de/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_de.tar.gz
> shows me 1811817
>
> while
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/binaries/de/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Linux_x86_install-deb_de.tar.gz
> is at 1811857
>
>
> Am 11.10.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Official SVN rev will be:
>>
>>    1811857.
>>
>> % svn info
>> Path: .
>> Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
>> URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
>> Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
>> Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
>> Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>> Revision: 1811857
>> Node Kind: directory
>> Schedule: normal
>> Last Changed Author: jim
>> Last Changed Rev: 1811857
>> Last Changed Date: 2017-10-11 13:48:15 -0400 (Wed, 11 Oct 2017)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

12