[sc-dev] Issue 55735

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[sc-dev] Issue 55735

Kohei Yoshida
Hi,

FYI, the patch attached to Issue 55735

http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55735

is ready for review and possibly integration.  Please let me know if
there is anything I could do to speed up the process.

Thanks,
Kohei

--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [sc-dev] Issue 55735

Niklas Nebel
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> FYI, the patch attached to Issue 55735
>
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
>
> is ready for review and possibly integration.  Please let me know if
> there is anything I could do to speed up the process.

Slow down earth's rotation, so there are more hours in a day.

I'm aware of the patch, and I'll take a look, but it seems too late for
inclusion into 2.0.1 anyway (a CWS needs to be built and approved by QA
and all, and QA are currently busy with the CWS's they already have).
But if there are no problems with the code itself, it will probably go
into 2.0.2.

Niklas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [sc-dev] Issue 55735

Kohei Yoshida
On 11/8/05, Niklas Nebel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Kohei Yoshida wrote:

> > is ready for review and possibly integration.  Please let me know if
> > there is anything I could do to speed up the process.
>
> Slow down earth's rotation, so there are more hours in a day.

Or move to another planet where a day is longer than earth's day.
Hey, maybe our remote sensing technology is good enough that we could
checkout/commit from another planet! :-)

Anyway, :-)

>
> I'm aware of the patch, and I'll take a look, but it seems too late for
> inclusion into 2.0.1 anyway (a CWS needs to be built and approved by QA
> and all, and QA are currently busy with the CWS's they already have).
> But if there are no problems with the code itself, it will probably go
> into 2.0.2.

Thanks for letting me know.  Would, myself creating a CWS and having
someone QA it help take some load off your shoulder, or not really?
Just a hypothetical scenario, as I don't know if I could find an
appropriate QA personnel...  But just a thought.

Kohei


--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [sc-dev] Issue 55735

Niklas Nebel
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Thanks for letting me know.  Would, myself creating a CWS and having
> someone QA it help take some load off your shoulder, or not really?
> Just a hypothetical scenario, as I don't know if I could find an
> appropriate QA personnel...  But just a thought.

Last 2.0.1 CWS integration is scheduled for tomorrow
(http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/OOoRelease201),
so even that wouldn't help.

For 2.0.2, we'll put it into a CWS together with other things for that
release, so all the CWS handling stuff won't have to be done for the one
patch alone.

Niklas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]