[vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
36 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Peter Kovacs-3
Hello all,


This is about a small maintenance Release. We fix various Issues.

Please take your vote.

The Release Candidate is good for production:

[ ] yes / +1

[ ] no / -1

My vote is based on

[ ] binding (member of PMC)

[ ] I have build and tested the RC from source

[ ] I have tested the binary RC


Thanks for your patience and participation!

All the Best

Peter Kovacs

Release Manager of 4.1.6



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Marcus (OOo)
Thanks for the vote.

To make it an official vote I miss the following information:

- What exactly do we vote for (link to the source and binaries)?
- What is the time for the vote? Please more than just the normal 72
hours so that we all can use a weekend for more testing.

Thanks

Marcus



Am 31.10.2018 um 22:20 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> This is about a small maintenance Release. We fix various Issues.
>
> Please take your vote.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Patricia Shanahan
Since this is a release vote, it is governed by the Apache policy on
Release Approval at
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval

"Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download
all signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that
they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below,
validate all cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the
result on their own platform."

Because of the extent to which our users depend on the compiled
packages, if I were participating in the vote I would also download and
test some of them, but building from signed source is required for a
binding +1.

On 10/31/2018 3:30 PM, Marcus wrote:

> Thanks for the vote.
>
> To make it an official vote I miss the following information:
>
> - What exactly do we vote for (link to the source and binaries)?
> - What is the time for the vote? Please more than just the normal 72
> hours so that we all can use a weekend for more testing.
>
> Thanks
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> Am 31.10.2018 um 22:20 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> This is about a small maintenance Release. We fix various Issues.
>>
>> Please take your vote.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Larry Gusaas-4
In reply to this post by Peter Kovacs-3
Where can I download 4.1.6 RC1 for macOS?


On 2018-10-31, 3:20 PM Peter Kovacs wrote concerning "[vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6
RC1":


--
_________________________________

Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com

"An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." - Edgard Varese


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Pedro Lino-3
In reply to this post by Patricia Shanahan
Hi all


I really would like to build from source (at least under Linux)!

But first I found a problem checking the src file integrity.

I'm using Double Commander's option Verify Checksum and all sha256 work correctly.

However for the sha512, the content of the file is

SHA512(./apache-openoffice-4.1.6-r1844436-src.tar.bz2)= eea09bea287059d8cb9e4107ba49f5bc0b46540c491175310ddef303e93fe114c37232471959ae49826d48d39b059b1c2d6d10a99e3cd44a1c75785ece7afdf4

but the program expects

eea09bea287059d8cb9e4107ba49f5bc0b46540c491175310ddef303e93fe114c37232471959ae49826d48d39b059b1c2d6d10a99e3cd44a1c75785ece7afdf4 *apache-openoffice-4.1.6-r1844436-src.tar.bz2

The generated string is exactly the same so sha512 is correct.
Is this a limitation of the program I'm using? Is everybody else able to use the sha512 file?

Thanks,
Pedro

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Pedro Lino-3
In reply to this post by Patricia Shanahan
Hi Patricia

I'm taking this opportunity to write to you directly (I hope this is not a problem)

Do you have experience building in Linux?

I have found this obstacle but no one on the dev mailing list answered (which worries me since I have been trying to contribute to this project...)

Any idea how to solve these dependencies problem?

Thank you in advance!

Best,
Pedro

plino@Latitude-E6520:/$ sudo apt-get install bison flex libarchive-zip-perl libcups2-dev        libpam0g-dev gperf libfreetype6-dev libxaw7-dev libfontconfig1-dev        libxrandr-dev patch libgconf2-dev libgnomevfs2-dev ant libgtk2.0-dev        junit junit4 libidl-dev liborbit2-dev libwww-perl        libxml-parser-perl autoconf libssl-dev libpam-dev libgstreamer\*
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree      
Reading state information... Done
Note, selecting 'libpam0g-dev' instead of 'libpam-dev'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer0.10-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-vaapi1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-0v5' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer1.0-0-dbg' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-doc' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-5f1y4:i386' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer0.10-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-bad0.10-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-dh5s9' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-5f1y4:i386' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer0.10-0-dbg' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-java' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dh5s9' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dh5s9'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-dh5s9'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml:i386' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-5f1y4:i386'
Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-5f1y4:i386'
autoconf is already the newest version (2.69-9).
autoconf set to manually installed.
libwww-perl is already the newest version (6.15-1).
libwww-perl set to manually installed.
libxml-parser-perl is already the newest version (2.44-1build1).
libxml-parser-perl set to manually installed.
libgstreamer-ocaml is already the newest version (0.2.0-2build2).
libgstreamer0.10-0 is already the newest version (0.10.36-1.5ubuntu1).
libgstreamer0.10-0 set to manually installed.
libarchive-zip-perl is already the newest version (1.56-2ubuntu0.1).
libarchive-zip-perl set to manually installed.
libfontconfig1-dev is already the newest version (2.11.94-0ubuntu1.1).
libfontconfig1-dev set to manually installed.
libfreetype6-dev is already the newest version (2.6.1-0.1ubuntu2.3).
libfreetype6-dev set to manually installed.
libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 set to manually installed.
libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.4).
libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0 set to manually installed.
libgstreamer1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1~ubuntu0.1).
libgstreamer1.0-0 set to manually installed.
libgstreamer1.0-dev is already the newest version (1.8.3-1~ubuntu0.1).
libssl-dev is already the newest version (1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.13).
libssl-dev set to manually installed.
patch is already the newest version (2.7.5-1ubuntu0.16.04.1).
patch set to manually installed.
libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 set to manually installed.
libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 is already the newest version (0.10.36-2ubuntu0.1).
libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 set to manually installed.
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libgstreamer-ocaml : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
 libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 : Depends: ocaml-base-nox-4.02.3:i386
                           Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
 libgstreamer-ocaml-dev : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
 libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 : Depends: ocaml-nox-4.02.3:i386
                               Depends: libgstreamer1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
                               Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
                               Depends: ocaml-findlib:i386 but it is not going to be installed
                               Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Peter Kovacs-3
I did not see this post from you.

Which Distro do you use?

You need Gstreamer 0.1.0 for OpenOffice 4.1.x series, if you want
Multimedia.

Support for Gstreamer 1.0.0 is included in 4.2.0.


All the best

Peter

On 01.11.18 12:49, Pedro Lino wrote:

> Hi Patricia
>
> I'm taking this opportunity to write to you directly (I hope this is not a problem)
>
> Do you have experience building in Linux?
>
> I have found this obstacle but no one on the dev mailing list answered (which worries me since I have been trying to contribute to this project...)
>
> Any idea how to solve these dependencies problem?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> Best,
> Pedro
>
> plino@Latitude-E6520:/$ sudo apt-get install bison flex libarchive-zip-perl libcups2-dev        libpam0g-dev gperf libfreetype6-dev libxaw7-dev libfontconfig1-dev        libxrandr-dev patch libgconf2-dev libgnomevfs2-dev ant libgtk2.0-dev        junit junit4 libidl-dev liborbit2-dev libwww-perl        libxml-parser-perl autoconf libssl-dev libpam-dev libgstreamer\*
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree      
> Reading state information... Done
> Note, selecting 'libpam0g-dev' instead of 'libpam-dev'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer0.10-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-vaapi1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-0v5' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer1.0-0-dbg' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-doc' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-5f1y4:i386' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer0.10-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-bad0.10-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-dh5s9' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-5f1y4:i386' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer0.10-0-dbg' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-java' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dh5s9' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dh5s9'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-dh5s9'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml:i386' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-5f1y4:i386'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-5f1y4:i386'
> autoconf is already the newest version (2.69-9).
> autoconf set to manually installed.
> libwww-perl is already the newest version (6.15-1).
> libwww-perl set to manually installed.
> libxml-parser-perl is already the newest version (2.44-1build1).
> libxml-parser-perl set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-ocaml is already the newest version (0.2.0-2build2).
> libgstreamer0.10-0 is already the newest version (0.10.36-1.5ubuntu1).
> libgstreamer0.10-0 set to manually installed.
> libarchive-zip-perl is already the newest version (1.56-2ubuntu0.1).
> libarchive-zip-perl set to manually installed.
> libfontconfig1-dev is already the newest version (2.11.94-0ubuntu1.1).
> libfontconfig1-dev set to manually installed.
> libfreetype6-dev is already the newest version (2.6.1-0.1ubuntu2.3).
> libfreetype6-dev set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
> libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.4).
> libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1~ubuntu0.1).
> libgstreamer1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer1.0-dev is already the newest version (1.8.3-1~ubuntu0.1).
> libssl-dev is already the newest version (1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.13).
> libssl-dev set to manually installed.
> patch is already the newest version (2.7.5-1ubuntu0.16.04.1).
> patch set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
> libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 is already the newest version (0.10.36-2ubuntu0.1).
> libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 set to manually installed.
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  libgstreamer-ocaml : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>  libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 : Depends: ocaml-base-nox-4.02.3:i386
>                            Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>  libgstreamer-ocaml-dev : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>  libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 : Depends: ocaml-nox-4.02.3:i386
>                                Depends: libgstreamer1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>                                Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>                                Depends: ocaml-findlib:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>                                Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Linux building problem (Was Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1)

Patricia Shanahan
In reply to this post by Pedro Lino-3
Your mail actually went to dev@, which is fine because I have no
experience building AOO on Linux, and dev@ is the right place to ask for
help. You should use a more appropriate subject.

On 11/1/2018 4:49 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:

> Hi Patricia
>
> I'm taking this opportunity to write to you directly (I hope this is not a problem)
>
> Do you have experience building in Linux?
>
> I have found this obstacle but no one on the dev mailing list answered (which worries me since I have been trying to contribute to this project...)
>
> Any idea how to solve these dependencies problem?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> Best,
> Pedro
>
> plino@Latitude-E6520:/$ sudo apt-get install bison flex libarchive-zip-perl libcups2-dev        libpam0g-dev gperf libfreetype6-dev libxaw7-dev libfontconfig1-dev        libxrandr-dev patch libgconf2-dev libgnomevfs2-dev ant libgtk2.0-dev        junit junit4 libidl-dev liborbit2-dev libwww-perl        libxml-parser-perl autoconf libssl-dev libpam-dev libgstreamer\*
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Note, selecting 'libpam0g-dev' instead of 'libpam-dev'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer0.10-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-vaapi1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-0v5' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer1.0-0-dbg' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamermm-1.0-doc' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-5f1y4:i386' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer0.10-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-bad0.10-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-dh5s9' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-5f1y4:i386' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer0.10-0-dbg' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-java' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer1.0-0' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dh5s9' for glob 'libgstreamer*'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dh5s9'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-dh5s9'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml:i386' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-5f1y4:i386'
> Note, selecting 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386' instead of 'libgstreamer-ocaml-dev-5f1y4:i386'
> autoconf is already the newest version (2.69-9).
> autoconf set to manually installed.
> libwww-perl is already the newest version (6.15-1).
> libwww-perl set to manually installed.
> libxml-parser-perl is already the newest version (2.44-1build1).
> libxml-parser-perl set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-ocaml is already the newest version (0.2.0-2build2).
> libgstreamer0.10-0 is already the newest version (0.10.36-1.5ubuntu1).
> libgstreamer0.10-0 set to manually installed.
> libarchive-zip-perl is already the newest version (1.56-2ubuntu0.1).
> libarchive-zip-perl set to manually installed.
> libfontconfig1-dev is already the newest version (2.11.94-0ubuntu1.1).
> libfontconfig1-dev set to manually installed.
> libfreetype6-dev is already the newest version (2.6.1-0.1ubuntu2.3).
> libfreetype6-dev set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
> libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.4).
> libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1~ubuntu0.1).
> libgstreamer1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer1.0-dev is already the newest version (1.8.3-1~ubuntu0.1).
> libssl-dev is already the newest version (1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.13).
> libssl-dev set to manually installed.
> patch is already the newest version (2.7.5-1ubuntu0.16.04.1).
> patch set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
> libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 is already the newest version (0.10.36-2ubuntu0.1).
> libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 set to manually installed.
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   libgstreamer-ocaml : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>   libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 : Depends: ocaml-base-nox-4.02.3:i386
>                             Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>   libgstreamer-ocaml-dev : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>   libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 : Depends: ocaml-nox-4.02.3:i386
>                                 Depends: libgstreamer1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>                                 Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>                                 Depends: ocaml-findlib:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>                                 Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Jim Jagielski
In reply to this post by Pedro Lino-3


> On Nov 1, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Pedro Lino <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Patricia
>
> I'm taking this opportunity to write to you directly (I hope this is not a problem)
>
> Do you have experience building in Linux?
>
>
...

> libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
> libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 is already the newest version (0.10.36-2ubuntu0.1).
> libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 set to manually installed.
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libgstreamer-ocaml : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 : Depends: ocaml-base-nox-4.02.3:i386
>                           Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> libgstreamer-ocaml-dev : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 : Depends: ocaml-nox-4.02.3:i386
>                               Depends: libgstreamer1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>                               Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>                               Depends: ocaml-findlib:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>                               Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

This does not look like a AOO source code or distro problem, per se, but rather user error. My first instinct would be to select *either* gstreamer 1.0 or .10 and not both.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Pedro Lino-3
Hi Jim, all

> On November 1, 2018 at 1:09 PM Jim Jagielski <[hidden email]> wrote:
> ...
> > libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
> > libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> > libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 is already the newest version (0.10.36-2ubuntu0.1).
> > libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 set to manually installed.

> This does not look like a AOO source code or distro problem, per se, but rather user error. My first instinct would be to select *either* gstreamer 1.0 or .10 and not both.

One is named libgstreamer-plugins-bad and the other one libgstreamer-plugins-base
So I assume that those are different packages and therefore the fact that they are different versions should not be relevant?

Maybe the problem is related to the fact that my OS is x64 while some required libraries are i386?

How can I specify that I want to install the i386 version of a given package?

> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > libgstreamer-ocaml : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> > libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 : Depends: ocaml-base-nox-4.02.3:i386
> >                           Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> > libgstreamer-ocaml-dev : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> > libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 : Depends: ocaml-nox-4.02.3:i386
> >                               Depends: libgstreamer1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
> >                               Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
> >                               Depends: ocaml-findlib:i386 but it is not going to be installed
> >                               Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Marcus (OOo)
Am 01.11.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Pedro Lino:

>> On November 1, 2018 at 1:09 PM Jim Jagielski <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> ...
>>> libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 is already the newest version (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
>>> libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 set to manually installed.
>>> libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 is already the newest version (0.10.36-2ubuntu0.1).
>>> libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 set to manually installed.
>
>> This does not look like a AOO source code or distro problem, per se, but rather user error. My first instinct would be to select *either* gstreamer 1.0 or .10 and not both.
>
> One is named libgstreamer-plugins-bad and the other one libgstreamer-plugins-base
> So I assume that those are different packages and therefore the fact that they are different versions should not be relevant?

it doesn't matter if you have the base, good or bad or ... package. But
the version number must be the same for all.

Correct:
libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0
libgstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10-0

Problem:
libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0
libgstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0-0

> Maybe the problem is related to the fact that my OS is x64 while some required libraries are i386?

No really, but Of course all packages need to be x386 *or* x64. Mixing
these lead also to problems.

> How can I specify that I want to install the i386 version of a given package?

A quick search via Google gave me this (I hope you are using Ubuntu):

https://superuser.com/questions/741380/how-to-install-i386-package-under-amd64-ubuntu-debian

HTH

Marcus



>>> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
>>> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
>>> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
>>> or been moved out of Incoming.
>>> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>>>
>>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>> libgstreamer-ocaml : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>>> libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 : Depends: ocaml-base-nox-4.02.3:i386
>>>                            Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>>> libgstreamer-ocaml-dev : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>>> libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 : Depends: ocaml-nox-4.02.3:i386
>>>                                Depends: libgstreamer1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>>>                                Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>>>                                Depends: ocaml-findlib:i386 but it is not going to be installed
>>>                                Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
>>> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Marcus (OOo)
In reply to this post by Pedro Lino-3
Am 01.11.2018 um 09:59 schrieb Pedro Lino:

>
> I really would like to build from source (at least under Linux)!
>
> But first I found a problem checking the src file integrity.
>
> I'm using Double Commander's option Verify Checksum and all sha256 work correctly.
>
> However for the sha512, the content of the file is
>
> SHA512(./apache-openoffice-4.1.6-r1844436-src.tar.bz2)= eea09bea287059d8cb9e4107ba49f5bc0b46540c491175310ddef303e93fe114c37232471959ae49826d48d39b059b1c2d6d10a99e3cd44a1c75785ece7afdf4
>
> but the program expects
>
> eea09bea287059d8cb9e4107ba49f5bc0b46540c491175310ddef303e93fe114c37232471959ae49826d48d39b059b1c2d6d10a99e3cd44a1c75785ece7afdf4 *apache-openoffice-4.1.6-r1844436-src.tar.bz2
>
> The generated string is exactly the same so sha512 is correct.
> Is this a limitation of the program I'm using? Is everybody else able to use the sha512 file?

I've tried myself und this is the result:

[21:09:11 marcus@fedora aoo]$ sha256sum -c
apache-openoffice-4.1.6-r1844436-src.tar.bz2.sha256
apache-openoffice-4.1.6-r1844436-src.tar.bz2: OK

[21:09:37 marcus@fedora aoo]$ sha512sum -c
apache-openoffice-4.1.6-r1844436-src.tar.bz2.sha512
./apache-openoffice-4.1.6-r1844436-src.tar.bz2: OK

Please can you check it with the board-tools of Ubuntu? I think you also
should have sha256sum and sha512sum as commands.

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Pedro Lino-3
Hi Marcus

> Please can you check it with the board-tools of Ubuntu? I think you also
> should have sha256sum and sha512sum as commands.

It does work for the src file with sha512sum so Double Commander is less versatile. But wouldn't it make sense to keep the two SHA files similar (i.e. <checksum_value> *<filename>?

Actually there is a bigger problem with the SHA512 files for _all_ the binaries in the RC1 folder: they include the folder name

Example
SHA512(./en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz)= c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb

Should be
SHA512(./Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz)= c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb

Or even easier

c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb *Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz

Thanks!
Pedro

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Pedro Lino-3
In reply to this post by Marcus (OOo)
Hi Marcus

> it doesn't matter if you have the base, good or bad or ... package. But
> the version number must be the same for all.
>
> Correct:
> libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0
> libgstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10-0
>
> Problem:
> libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0
> libgstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0-0

Ok. Thank you for the explanation.
 

> > Maybe the problem is related to the fact that my OS is x64 while some required libraries are i386?
>
> No really, but Of course all packages need to be x386 *or* x64. Mixing
> these lead also to problems.
>
> > How can I specify that I want to install the i386 version of a given package?
>
> A quick search via Google gave me this (I hope you are using Ubuntu):
>
> https://superuser.com/questions/741380/how-to-install-i386-package-under-amd64-ubuntu-debian

Thanks.

Unfortunately I ran the install command line to look for errors and Ubuntu reported there were new versions of a huge number of packages and after I installed them, no more errors showed up and building seems to be running smoothly :)
(I said unfortunately because I really don't like when problems get fixed without any logic...)

Thank you again for your patience ;)

Best regards
Pedro

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Marcus (OOo)
In reply to this post by Pedro Lino-3
Am 02.11.2018 um 00:00 schrieb Pedro Lino:

>> Please can you check it with the board-tools of Ubuntu? I think you also
>> should have sha256sum and sha512sum as commands.
>
> It does work for the src file with sha512sum so Double Commander is less versatile. But wouldn't it make sense to keep the two SHA files similar (i.e. <checksum_value> *<filename>?
>
> Actually there is a bigger problem with the SHA512 files for _all_ the binaries in the RC1 folder: they include the folder name
>
> Example
> SHA512(./en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz)= c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb
>
> Should be
> SHA512(./Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz)= c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb
>
> Or even easier
>
> c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb *Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz

AFAIK the data is created by a script. I haven't checked, so it's
possible that the way of creation is different for both. Or that they
are done by 2 different persons.

It would be indeed better to have all check sums in the same style.

Is it possible to do this before we have the release?

Thanks

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Marcus (OOo)
In reply to this post by Pedro Lino-3
Am 02.11.2018 um 00:21 schrieb Pedro Lino:

> Hi Marcus
>
>> it doesn't matter if you have the base, good or bad or ... package. But
>> the version number must be the same for all.
>>
>> Correct:
>> libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0
>> libgstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10-0
>>
>> Problem:
>> libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0
>> libgstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0-0
>
> Ok. Thank you for the explanation.
>  
>>> Maybe the problem is related to the fact that my OS is x64 while some required libraries are i386?
>>
>> No really, but Of course all packages need to be x386 *or* x64. Mixing
>> these lead also to problems.
>>
>>> How can I specify that I want to install the i386 version of a given package?
>>
>> A quick search via Google gave me this (I hope you are using Ubuntu):
>>
>> https://superuser.com/questions/741380/how-to-install-i386-package-under-amd64-ubuntu-debian
>
> Thanks.
>
> Unfortunately I ran the install command line to look for errors and Ubuntu reported there were new versions of a huge number of packages and after I installed them, no more errors showed up and building seems to be running smoothly :)
> (I said unfortunately because I really don't like when problems get fixed without any logic...)
>
> Thank you again for your patience ;)

great that it works now.

Dependency errors can be very ugly to handle. So, maybe you should be
happy even you don't know what the root cause is. ;-)

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Matthias Seidel
In reply to this post by Marcus (OOo)
Hi Marcus,

Am 02.11.18 um 00:28 schrieb Marcus:

> Am 02.11.2018 um 00:00 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>> Please can you check it with the board-tools of Ubuntu? I think you
>>> also
>>> should have sha256sum and sha512sum as commands.
>>
>> It does work for the src file with sha512sum so Double Commander is
>> less versatile. But wouldn't it make sense to keep the two SHA files
>> similar (i.e. <checksum_value> *<filename>?
>>
>> Actually there is a bigger problem with the SHA512 files for _all_
>> the binaries in the RC1 folder: they include the folder name
>>
>> Example
>> SHA512(./en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz)=
>> c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb
>>
>>
>> Should be
>> SHA512(./Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz)=
>> c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb
>>
>>
>> Or even easier
>>
>> c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb
>> *Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
I have just corrected the script to have identical output for SHA256 and
SHA512.

>
> AFAIK the data is created by a script. I haven't checked, so it's
> possible that the way of creation is different for both. Or that they
> are done by 2 different persons.
>
> It would be indeed better to have all check sums in the same style.
>
> Is it possible to do this before we have the release?

I remember that we had the same problem with included paths for 4.1.5
(Not for Windows files, as I generate them separate for every
directory). Jim corrected that before the release of 4.1.5.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Thanks
>
> Marcus
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Pedro Lino-3
Hi Matthias, all


> On November 2, 2018 at 12:33 AM Matthias Seidel <[hidden email] mailto:[hidden email] > wrote:
>
>     I have just corrected the script to have identical output for SHA256 and
>     SHA512.
>

Thank you! It works correctly with any program!


>
>         > > AFAIK the data is created by a script. I haven't checked, so it's
> >         possible that the way of creation is different for both. Or that they
> >         are done by 2 different persons.
> >
> >     >
>         > > It would be indeed better to have all check sums in the same style.
> >
> >     >
>         > > Is it possible to do this before we have the release?
> >
> >     >     I remember that we had the same problem with included paths for 4.1.5
>     (Not for Windows files, as I generate them separate for every
>     directory). Jim corrected that before the release of 4.1.5.
>


If your new script is used for all the binaries it would be perfect.


Best regards,

Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Matthias Seidel
Am 02.11.18 um 11:35 schrieb Pedro Lino:

> Hi Matthias, all
>
>
>> On November 2, 2018 at 12:33 AM Matthias Seidel <[hidden email] mailto:[hidden email] > wrote:
>>
>>     I have just corrected the script to have identical output for SHA256 and
>>     SHA512.
>>
> Thank you! It works correctly with any program!
>
>
>>         > > AFAIK the data is created by a script. I haven't checked, so it's
>>>         possible that the way of creation is different for both. Or that they
>>>         are done by 2 different persons.
>>>
>>>     >
>>         > > It would be indeed better to have all check sums in the same style.
>>>     >
>>         > > Is it possible to do this before we have the release?
>>>     >     I remember that we had the same problem with included paths for 4.1.5
>>     (Not for Windows files, as I generate them separate for every
>>     directory). Jim corrected that before the release of 4.1.5.
>>
>
> If your new script is used for all the binaries it would be perfect.
I will renew all SHA512 hash files for my Windows builds soon. I only
did it for the source first...

Maybe Jim can update his files and (if possible) change the script to
leave out the paths?

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pedro
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Jim Jagielski
I'm not exactly sure 100% what needs to be changed... Plus, if we change the names of files, don't we need to ensure that the sourceforge links are correct as well? Has that been looked at?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

12